• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Celebrities And Their Right To Privacy Essay

Should Celebrities Have Their Right To Privacy?

Should celebrities have their right to privacy? Before newspapers, television, and the internet, ordinary people were not exposed to endless stories about celebrities. Today, however we are bombarded with information about who is dating whom, where they eat, and what they wear from magazines such as People, Entertainment Weekly, and Star. Also, most ordinary people respect the rights of others to a private life. However, some people are just obsessed to get information out of celebrities. They want to know everything about them and have a desire for more information. Celebrities should have their right to privacy due to historical/practical rights, their invasion of privacy with paparazzi, and their children’s rights to privacy. They are ordinary people just with a famous role in life.
Historical/practical rights are one of the biggest issues and it all started back in colonial America. In colonial America, privacy was constrained. Colonial homes were often crowded, affording little privacy. There have been many events about privacy since 1639. In 1787, the U.S. Constitution was written declaring it does not contain an express right of privacy, in Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3, the Constitution mandates that a census be conducted every ten years. Critics of the census regard it as a threat to privacy (Right of Privacy Time).
In September 25, 1789, the First Amendment protects people’s privacy of beliefs without government intrusion. The Fourth Amendment protects one’s person and possessions from unreasonable searches and seizures. On February 1, 1886 in Boyd v. U.S. Supreme Court recognized the protection of privacy interests under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. In the 1890s, the legal concept of privacy in the United States sketches back to 1890 when the development of newspaper photography and yellow journalism. The article “The Right to Privacy” became the foundation of privacy tort law in America. For example, there are laws in some states that bar the press from recording private conversations and then the police began wiretapping telephones (“At Issue: Privacy and the Press”). Beginning in 1905, the Georgia Supreme Court in Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Company became the first court to recognize that a common law right of privacy exists in the state. That has used an unauthorized photograph of the plaintiff Paolo Pavesich and attributed statements to him that he did not make. In 1920 The American Civil Liberties Union is dedicated to protecting First Amendment rights and rights to equal protection under the law, due process, and privacy. The European Convention on Human Rights states that all people have a “right to respect for private and family life, his home and his correspondence in 1950. Also on December 18, 1967, the U.S Supreme Court in Katz v. U.S ruled that wiretaps must have court approval, even in places open to the public, such as a public telephone booth (Right of Privacy Timeline)....

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Do People in Public Life Have a Right to Privacy?

1662 words - 7 pages Do People in Public Life Have a Right to Privacy?People, famous or not, have a right to privacy, which is a basic human right. Although some of them have voluntarily made themselves known to the world, they are still entitled to live a life without others following them all the time, eavesdropping on...

Should Women Have the Right to Abortion?

1262 words - 5 pages One morning in June 8, 1964 a woman was found “naked, kneeling, collapsed upon the floor, with a bloody towel between her legs” by a maid in a motel room in Connecticut. Gerri Santoro is one of the many American women that died from an induced illegal abortion in the United States prior to Roe v. Wade. Unfortunately since then anti-abortion activists have tried to revoke these rights and have successfully pass excessive regulations and...

The Right to Privacy for Employees and Their Email

888 words - 4 pages Frustrated employees use company electronic mail (e-mail) to send messages threatening other employees with physical violence. Others use company e-mail to send and receive sexually explicit images, offensive jokes, chain letters or use company e-mail to place bets, or even worse, to operate an illegal gambling ring. Employee advocacy groups assert that it is unethical for employers to monitor employees? e-mail because it violates employees?...

Should mothers to be have a right to abortion?

1013 words - 4 pages "Should Mothers-To-Be Have A Right To Abortion?"Abortion is the spontaneous or induced termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus, as stated in

Should adults have the right to die as they choose?

1744 words - 7 pages During one of his numerous trials regarding his involvement in assisted suicides and instances of euthanasia, Dr. Jack Kevorkian defended his practice stating, “My intent was to carry out my duty as a doctor, to end their suffering. Unfortunately, that entailed, in their cases, ending of the life (Lessenberry 2)”. Dr. Kevorkian, also known as “Dr. Death”, is the most well know right-to-die activist who euthanized and assisted in the suicides of...

To what extend does a person have the right to their own believes.

1779 words - 7 pages To what extend does a person have the right to their own believes.Recently, people are more grabbing into religion just to find something, anything to believe in. Religion is more than just a belief; I think is a way of life. It can define who you are, how you view the world around you and how you interact within it. There are as many different types of religion as there are different types of people. For so many people religion is part...

Adopted Children Have the Right to Know the Identities of Their Birth Parents

876 words - 4 pages Every day children are born to parent’s that give them up for adoption for one reason or another. This reason usually plays an important role in determining whether the biological parent(s) want their identities known by the child. Although the reason may be fundamental to the parents in shaping whether they choose yes or no, its value should not take precedence over the fact that adopted children have the right to know the identities of their...

Should Doctors Have the Right To Refuse Surgery On Patients who smoke and will continue to do so after surgery.

1030 words - 4 pages Human Awareness EssayAnthony WignallIntroShould doctors have the right to refuse to refuse surgery on patients who smoke and will continue to do so? There are many arguments that support each side of this issue. Smoking is an extremely unhealthy habit. If continued over many years of a person's life it can lead to many undesirable effects, such as lung cancer. The surgery smokers may require is very expensive, but in most...

Dating in the workplace: Do employers have the right to regulate the social activities of their employees?

1297 words - 5 pages Many couples' meet in the workplace because that is where many people spend the majority of their waking hours. The workplace is also a great place to get to know other people that may have similar interests. However, there is a catch. Rapid increases in sexual harassment lawsuits by employees have left employers scrambling to protect themselves. Therefore, workplace protections against sexual harassment have grown much stronger in recent...

A persuasive essay leaning towards the fact abortion should be a decision women have the right to make.

594 words - 2 pages Think for a second that you are against abortion. Now put yourself in the shoes of a father or relative of a woman who was raped or a young teenager who was impregnated by her boyfriend. Would you still be against it then? It is easy to be against something that has never affected your life. You can say abortion is murder and it is wrong, but it is a choice women have the right to make. Whether or not to have an abortion is a decision women...

The Courts Should Not Have the Right to Make Legislation that the Majority of People Do Not Approve Of

680 words - 3 pages The Courts Should Not Have the Right to Make Legislation that the Majority of People Do Not Approve Of Democracy is defined by Merriam - Webster's dictionary as "government by the people; especially: rule of the majority." America was founded to protect individual's rights and freedoms from being violated by the government. Our Constitution and the Bill of Rights were specifically written to limit the powers of the government. The courts...

For Britney Spears, Sandra Bullock, Princess Caroline of Monaco, and scores of other celebrities, fame more often than not comes at a price – the loss of one’s privacy.

Living their day-to-day lives in the public eye, many celebrities must contend with the fabrications and distortions of gossip columnists, the infatuation of stalkers, and the unrelenting paparazzi, who follow them into restaurants, to their children’s schools, on vacations, and even into their own residential neighborhoods.

In her book, Outrageous Invasions: Celebrities’ Private Lives, Media, and the Law (Oxford University Press, 2010), published earlier this year, law professor Robin Barnes examines how the private lives of the rich and famous – on display for the public in the form of entertainment news shows, tabloid magazine headlines, and online Hollywood gossip blogs – are routinely invaded in what she calls our “tell-all society.”

“Citizens of the United States [and] European Union are guaranteed constitutionally protected rights to safety, privacy, and freedom of self-expression,” Barnes writes in her introduction to OutrageousInvasions. And yet, she asserts, these rights are frequently violated in the case of American celebrities.

To listen to an interview with Barnes, click here: Law professor Robin Barnes discusses her new book, Outrageous Invasions.

Celebrities Are Not Public Servants

Over the past several decades, Barnes says, the U.S. press has been granted increased freedom. Although this is considered a positive development important to our democratic way of life, Barnes demonstrates how it has in the meantime permitted tabloid publishers “to expand their cottage industry of disseminating the intimate details of the lives of the rich and famous” – without regard for these individuals’ rights to privacy.

Barnes’ book touches on the ‘outrageous invasions’ endured by a wide range of celebrities, from Tiger Woods, John Lennon, and Arnold Schwarzenegger to Naomi Campbell and Nadya Suleman – branded by the press as “Octomom” – to Suri Cruise and other children of stars.

According to Barnes, who teaches courses in constitutional law and serves as a national and international speaker on issues related to democracy, free speech, privacy, and human rights, not every celebrity should necessarily be regarded as a public figure, nor should their personal lives be considered “matters of public concern.”

“We know we have to keep an eye on public officials,” she says. “The question is, does that entitle us to know everything about Monica Lewinsky’s dress? Why throw every athlete, actor, and musician into the same pot? Celebrities are not public servants. They don’t wield that much influence. That argument is specious at best. The European Convention contains specific provisions that identify human dignity as a paramount value. Individuals, including members of the media and representatives of the government, must behave in ways that are respectful toward a person’s private and family life. Not so in the United States, where free speech always trumps.”

Examining the outcomes of numerous legal battles from the U.S. Supreme Court as well as the High Courts of Europe, Barnes identifies the differences in the protections granted European celebrities versus those given to American stars when it comes to the entertainment press.

Barnes points out that in France, for instance, photographs that are not of public interest cannot be published without the celebrity’s permission.

“In Europe they talk about free development of personality and human dignity,” she says. “They insist upon a meaningful definition of what the public has a right to know. They want to separate the issue because of the longstanding need to offer respect for individual privacy.”

Corporations and the Media

While Tiger Woods’ apologies for his extramarital affairs received “wall-to-wall network coverage,” Barnes notes that similarly timed news about the hefty bonuses awarded to bank executives in the wake of the bailout was given minimal attention.

“We give the press a wide range of freedom – to look at the banks, not to ruin Tiger’s family,” Barnes says.

“We’re in a situation where five or six major corporations own the media – not only the newspapers and television channels, but the magazines, Internet sites, blogs, the PR firms, the publishing houses,” she says. “They keep the public focused on celebrities. When they can get people to focus on Tiger Woods and not the corporate scandals on Wall Street, they win.”

Having written Outrageous Invasions with an audience of “everyone” in mind, Barnes hopes her book is accessible enough for “undergraduates to leaf through it, but also professors at the graduate level to use it in class as well.” She has assembled a supplement to the book – Privacy and Defamation in the U.S. and European Union – which contains cases, legal articles, an electronic teaching manual, and other accompanying materials that may be used to teach this topic as a graduate course. Ideally, however, Barnes would like to put the book in the hands of the people she wants to read it – namely, she says, every judge on the federal circuit.

The law school is having a banner year for books, with the publication of 10 new faculty works – including Barnes’s book – by major academic presses. In honor of these and other faculty publications in respected law journals, the school has dubbed the 2010-2011 academic year ‘The Year of the Book.’

One thought on “Celebrities And Their Right To Privacy Essay

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *